Long-Term Notes
Combined notes: I think SpaceX's $1.75T IPO price is severely overvalued. Because of the deliberately designed structure, it may surge after the IPO and become even more overvalued. I think there is a short opportunity here.
Technology roadmap: launch satellites into orbit with rockets, satellite communications, AI, space data centers, and chip manufacturing.
Stock communities:
- Reddit. # An engineering and technology community, not a stock community.
- Seeking Alpha comments.
Signals that I am wrong:
- Space data centers actually make meaningful progress.
Study Notes
Understanding the company and technology
2026-06-08 Elon describes the business and technology vision
- Share of energy usage: Earth, the Sun, the galaxy.
2026-06-04 Jamie Dimon event
Online Thesis
2026-06-16 DP video
- AI becomes a commodity. No differentiation.
- SPCX is extremely capital intensive.
2026-06-19 BA video
Time-Sensitive Notes
Created note
Decision: first watch how things develop after the IPO. I think the IPO price is already very overvalued, but because of the deliberately designed IPO structure, it will probably keep rising to an absurd valuation. At that point I may choose to step in and short it.
Compare P/S with TSLA.
| Company / stage | Market cap | Revenue | P/S |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPCX IPO $135 | $1.77T | $18.7B | 94.5x |
| SPCX ~$180 | $2.35T | $18.7B | 126x |
| SPCX $270 / 3.5T | $3.53T | $18.7B | 189x |
| TSLA IPO 2010 | ~$1.58B | 2009 revenue $111.9M | 14.1x |
| TSLA 2010 year-end | ~$2.48B | 2010 revenue $116.7M | 21.3x |
| TSLA 2013 year-end | ~$18.44B | 2013 revenue $2.013B | 9.2x |
| TSLA 2020 mania year-end | ~$668.9B | 2020 revenue $31.54B | 21.2x |
Even compared with TSLA at its peak, SPCX's current P/S is absurd.
When will index funds buy?
- First wave: 6/18 - 6/23
- Second wave: 6/26 - 6/30
- Third wave: 7/6 - 7/8 Nasdaq-100
Build a plan to short SPCX - Plan A
| SPCX | Market cap | Target position / initial NAV | Target amount | Active addition at this level | Total shares | SPCX unrealized loss | NAV after loss | SPCX position / NAV after loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 185 | 2.40T | 10.0% | $136,088 | $136,088 | 736 | $0 | $1,360,883 | 10.0% |
| 205 | 2.66T | 14.0% | $190,524 | $39,723 | 929 | $14,712 | $1,346,171 | 14.2% |
| 225 | 2.92T | 19.0% | $258,568 | $49,456 | 1,149 | $33,300 | $1,327,583 | 19.5% |
| 245 | 3.18T | 25.0% | $340,221 | $58,669 | 1,389 | $56,284 | $1,304,599 | 26.1% |
| 265 | 3.44T | 33.0% | $449,091 | $81,098 | 1,695 | $84,057 | $1,276,826 | 35.2% |
Losses in extreme scenarios.
| SPCX | Corresponding market cap | SPCX cumulative unrealized loss | Unrealized loss / initial NAV | NAV after loss | SPCX position / initial NAV | SPCX position / NAV after loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 265 | 3.44T | $84,057 | 6.2% | $1,276,826 | 33.0% | 35.2% |
| 285 | 3.69T | $117,950 | 8.7% | $1,242,933 | 35.5% | 38.9% |
| 300 | 3.89T | $143,370 | 10.5% | $1,217,513 | 37.4% | 41.8% |
| 325 | 4.21T | $185,737 | 13.6% | $1,175,146 | 40.5% | 46.9% |
| 350 | 4.54T | $228,105 | 16.8% | $1,132,778 | 43.6% | 52.4% |
| 375 | 4.86T | $270,472 | 19.9% | $1,090,411 | 46.7% | 58.3% |
| 400 | 5.19T | $312,839 | 23.0% | $1,048,044 | 49.8% | 64.7% |
| 450 | 5.83T | $397,573 | 29.2% | $963,310 | 56.0% | 79.2% |
| 500 | 6.48T | $482,307 | 35.4% | $878,576 | 62.3% | 96.4% |
Decision: follow Plan A and create a 10% short position.
| Date | Ticker | Type | Action | Position before | Position after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-15 | SPCX | Stock | Short | -10.03% |
2026-06-16 Tuesday: Options became available.
| SS calculation | SPCX |
|---|---|
| Expiration date | 2028-12-15 |
| Time to expiration - years | 2.50 |
| Strike price | 210.00 |
| Current share price | 211.70 |
| Credit - worst | 9.20 |
| Credit - actual | 16.30 |
| Credit - best | 23.40 |
| Annual return - worst, including fees | 1.46% |
| Annual return - corresponding, including fees | 2.92% |
| Annual return - best, including fees | 4.45% |
| Total loss - round-trip commission | 0.01% |
| Total loss - round-trip total spread | 6.71% |
2026-06-16 Current share price 210. Continue following Plan A and add to 14%.
| Date | Ticker | Type | Action | Position before | Position after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-16 | SPCX | Stock | Short | -11.30% | -13.88% |
2026-06-17 On the current Float and subsequent index buying.
- Shares from the Cursor Deal. 60B shares. Closes in 2027Q3. There is also a Lock Up afterward. So this will not become new Supply in the near term.
- Current market cap ≈ $2.52T | Float market cap ≈ $122.2B | Float as a share of total shares ≈ 4.86%
| Index / ETF category | Timing | Potential inflow / buying | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRSP / VTI / broad total market | Around 6/18-6/23 | Rough estimate for VTI alone: ~$1.5B-$1.7B | Float-weighted; VTI AUM about $607B; SPCX float weight about 0.26%-0.27% |
| Vanguard broad index products | Over the coming days/weeks | Initial weight in any single fund mostly ≤1% | Vanguard explicitly said it would add the stock gradually and based on float |
| Nasdaq-100 / QQQ / QQQM | Around 7/6-7/8 | Roughly ~$6B-$10B, depending on total tracking AUM | Business Insider estimates an NDX weight of about 0.47%-0.70%; SpotGamma says NDX + Russell could generate $22B-$27B of automatic buying |
| Russell / FTSE Russell category | The rules and methodology are more complicated | Could be an important part of total passive buying | Combined with Nasdaq-100, estimates could reach $22B-$27B |
| MSCI | Around 6/26-6/30 | No reliable standalone amount found | Potential second wave of passive / benchmark buying |
- Estimated retail buying is about $0.5B and leveraged ETFs about $1B. By comparison, the roughly $8B still to come is a little scary.
The stock fell quite a bit
Current holdings:
Total Gain Total Return Exposure Weight
32,524.80 19.02% -138,521.60 -10.08%
Current share price: $154.60 | Current market cap: $2.04T
What a shame. I have made a fair amount, but the initial rise was genuinely terrifying, so I sized the position much more conservatively than I first expected. The maximum position only reached 14%, leaving more room to keep adding if it kept rising. | It still does not feel over. After the Index Funds step in to take the other side, if the stock can rally again, I may consider adding a little more aggressively.
Index buying is not completely over. MSCI / the second wave on 6/26-6/30 and Nasdaq-100 on 7/6-7/8 could still produce a rebound.
- Hedgeye estimates total passive demand over the coming weeks at about 139M shares, previously about $26B using the higher share price. Recalculated at the current $154.60, that is about $21.5B, or about 21.8% of the current public float. The Nasdaq-100 leg alone is about 61M shares, about $9.4B at the current price, or about 9.5% of float.
How index funds operate
| Timing | Index / product | Status | Main related funds | Buying estimate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| After June 18 | CRSP U.S. Market Indexes | Completed / completed in stages | VTI, VTSAX, VUG, MGK, etc. | Several billion dollars, but execution was dispersed |
| June 18-22 | FTSE Global Indexes | Completed | VT, VTWAX, etc. | Calculated using actual free-float market cap |
| June 26 close | Russell 1000/3000/Top 200 | Completed | IWB, IWF, and institutional products | Estimated at about $2.7B-$6B, with a very wide range |
| Effective June 29 | MSCI USA / World / ACWI system | Mostly completed | MSCI index ETFs and institutional accounts | Estimated at about $3B-$5B, but not all of it is passive money |
| July 6 close | Nasdaq-100 implementation | Not yet completed | QQQ, QQQM, and global NDX products | Reasonable estimate: $4B-$7B |
| Before the July 7 open | Official Nasdaq-100 entry | Confirmed | Same as above | The index already includes SPCX |
| September quarterly rebalance | Adjust weight based on newly floated shares | Potential next wave | Nasdaq and other index products | Depends on the actual number of shares unlocked in August and September |
| Mid-2027 or later | S&P 500 | Not yet eligible | SPY, VOO, etc. | Requires sufficient trading history, profitability, and a committee decision |
How index funds buy
The basic process is:
- The index provider announces the constituents and weights.
- The fund calculates its target holding: fund NAV × SPCX index weight ÷ SPCX price = shares required
- The fund manager decides when to execute.
- After the close on the trading day before the effective date, the fund's holdings should be as close as possible to the new index.
- The position is then fine-tuned based on fund creations and redemptions, price changes, and index-weight changes.
Common execution methods include:
- MOC / Closing Cross: trade in the closing auction on the day before the effective date. The advantage is that the execution price matches the index calculation price, minimizing tracking error.
- Buy early in batches: build the position gradually over several days to reduce impact, while accepting tracking error from SPCX moving before entry.
- VWAP algorithm: buy throughout the day according to the volume profile.
- Futures, swaps, or basket trades: obtain index exposure first, then gradually replace it with physical shares.
- ETF creation baskets: authorized participants and market makers deliver shares to the ETF, so the fund does not necessarily sweep the open market directly.
A passive fund manager is evaluated on:
- Did I keep up with the index?
Not on:
- Is SPCX worth $2.2T?
They choose between two types of cost:
- Buy early: price volatility may hurt them.
- Buy at the final close: arbitrage capital may push the price up, but tracking error is smaller.
- Recent research adds another side: these so-called front-runners also take risk early, prepare inventory, and ultimately provide liquidity to index funds. The more arbitrageurs there are, the harder they compete with one another, potentially lowering the impact cost actually paid by the funds.
SPCX's total market cap is about $2.23T, but only about 638.9M shares currently float, roughly 4.86% of total shares:
- Current float market cap: about $108.2B
- Nasdaq's '3× float market-cap cap': about $324.6B | 3 × float market cap
- The market currently estimates SPCX's initial Nasdaq-100 weight at about 0.5%-0.9%. Using $800B of tracking assets as a rough estimate:
- Assumed weight Theoretical exposure Shares at $169.38 Share of current Float
- 0.90% $7.2B 42.5M shares 6.7%
Design a new plan - Plan B
| Share price | Market cap | Target / today's NAV | Natural position before adding | SPCX total unrealized P&L | Actual position / NAV after loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $170.76 | $2.25T | 13% | 11.23% | +$18,045 | 13.0% |
| $190 | $2.50T | 16% | 14.7% | -$1,906 | 16.2% |
| $210 | $2.76T | 20% | 18.3% | -$24,846 | 20.7% |
| $230 | $3.03T | 25% | 23.1% | -$50,806 | 26.3% |
| $250 | $3.29T | 32% | 29.3% | -$80,426 | 34.5% |
| $265.97 | $3.50T | 40% | 37.5% | -$108,278 | 44.1% |
| SPCX | Market cap | Cumulative loss versus today | Loss / today's NAV | Remaining NAV | Actual SPCX position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $266 | $3.50T | $126,324 | 9.3% | $1,236,072 | 44.1% |
| $300 | $3.95T | $196,051 | 14.4% | $1,166,345 | 52.7% |
| $350 | $4.61T | $298,501 | 21.9% | $1,063,895 | 67.4% |
| $400 | $5.26T | $400,951 | 29.4% | $961,445 | 85.2% |
| $450 | $5.92T | $503,401 | 36.9% | $858,995 | 107.3% |
| $500 | $6.58T | $605,851 | 44.5% | $756,545 | 135.4% |
Risk: the July 6 closing auction remains a clear execution point, and SPCX is the first exceptionally large, low-Float, fast-entry case under the new rules. There is no fully comparable historical example.
- But I planned additions after further price increases and left plenty of room. If this really happens, it is actually an opportunity for me too.
The current plan is more aggressive than the previous one, but I also think the period of greatest upside volatility has now passed. Risk has decreased.
Decision: add to 13%.
| Date | Ticker | Type | Action | Quantity | Total amount | Execution price | Position before | Position after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | SPCX | Stock | Short | -159.00 | 27,258.39 | 171.44 | -11.04% | -13.11% |
Index inclusion is basically done, it did not rise, and I still want to add
Nasdaq-100 inclusion is complete. It barely rose and actually fell. The strong upside catalyst I feared most is over. I looked for other upside catalysts that might still remain. | I did not find anything that worries me. The downside driver, on the other hand, is very clear: the upcoming lockup unlock.
Stock Total Gain Total Return Exposure Weight
SPCX 37,684.60 19.00% -160,623.75 -11.30%
Share price $152.70, market cap $2.01T.
Under both previous Plans A and B, I added as the price rose. But the price has actually fallen now. I want to add, and I decided to add, but stay conservative and do not add too much. | This is a one-time deviation because the upside catalysts are exhausted + the unlock is approaching.
Decision: add from the current -11.30% to -14.00%.
| Date | Ticker | Type | Action | Quantity | Total amount | Execution price | Position before | Position after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-07 | SPCX | Stock | Short | -265.00 | 40,469.96 | 152.72 | -11.19% | -14.01% |